Western support for the last two of the groups in exile in Switzerland for the so-called non-governmental meeting. One is due to endless infighting and corruption which have long been notorious in the overseas, the credibility of the insolvency of the pro-democracy movement, a Nobel peace prize is a ring of the Dalai clique. On the Nobel Peace Prize, you sure you want to say a few words. The sixties of the last century the United States invasion of Vietnam, created the largest post-World War II a war. Unexpectedly, after the defeat on the battlefield, the United States to intervene with the Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to negotiate an end to the war in Vietnam. Also be followed by the U.S. military withdrawal from Vietnam. In this way, Henry Kissinger received the Nobel Peace Prize, to be more absurd and more ridiculous. Others have won this award to destroy the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev and the overthrow of the Communist Party of Poland, Lech Walesa, a little further to see if, when the Czech Republic in Munich betrayed to the Nazis in Germany who have been followed by the Nobel Peace Prize. So what is the nature of this award and what to use, and everyone must understand.
Closer to home. What are these two pictures can not board, said the exile groups are not met to do? In fact, they are talking about a nation and democracy, autonomy and independence, and many other issues. Ironically, one is to monopolize all powers of the religious summit, one is only fighting for several decades and corruption, how are qualified to talk about democracy? However, after three days of discussion, or reached a consensus document: First, great emphasis on the autonomy of Tibet based on the actual text ---- avoided despite the use of "Great Tibet" was, but pointed out that in addition to the autonomous region now also includes Yunnan, Tibetans living in Sichuan and other traditional areas. That there is a Chinese Han chauvinism, I do not know the Dalai Lama must adhere to the "Greater Tibet" What kind of Marxism? The second is that the Tibet issue only in a democratic China which can be resolved. These are the hackneyed. Just a few days ago actually, the Dalai Lama also met with in Germany is some background to the mainland, said more bluntly: "Only democracy can completely overcome the separatists. I often say, like India and China can be more than . because India is a big country, it has billions of people, it has a different nationality, ... ... However, there is no one place that it should be split, the Government of India is not worried about a certain place will be split. only in Kashmir, the Kashmir issue caused by Pakistan. So I said, why is it so, because it's the system. It is clear that it is a poor country, but it is a democratic country, democratic society. "
In fact, the Dalai Lama in a dilemma either of these words, or are contrary to reality. Dalai Lama has always advocated not to pursue their own independence. But China is not in his eyes a democratic country. Obviously China's democracy and independence or not. India during the colonial era in the United Kingdom can maintain unity, an independent immediately divided into two. Until now, India has been seeking an independent Sikh. Former Indian Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi was killed in the hands of her Sikh guards. Even their own are unable to convince the guards to have kill her, there is still a position to say that democracy can solve the ethnic issue. History of the United States to use force to unify twice. Lincoln first was unconstitutional suppression of the southern states seceded from the union. First, the suppression of force in 1997, "Republic of Texas." However, there is a word, say the Dalai Lama very thought: "It is a poor country, but it is a democratic country, democratic society." Poor does not matter, as long as there is democracy, there is the Cultural Revolution, "I would rather the grass to socialism, not capitalism Miller" feeling.
Such self-contradictory speech, the Dalai Lama is not today, but also in the East and the West are extremely pleasant to say. He went to Beijing in 1954 that communism and Tibetan Buddhism have much in common, but also wants to become a Communist Party member. Later to the West, he claimed that the publication of the autobiography of Tibetan Buddhism and democracy have much in common. He was Mao Zedong's poem addressed to no less than that now sing the praises of Western democracy. Here you may wish to extract ( "The Birth of Modern Tibet," A TOM GRUNFELD):
Ah! Chairman Mao! Your performance as a brilliant and
Brahma the Creator and the 众敬王（sorry.I don’t know how to translate it ）large as
Only from the countless good deeds can be the birth of such a leader,
He shines like the sun the earth.
Your book as valuable as pearls,
The same as the surging waves,
Far and the End of the World
(啊！毛主席！您的光辉和业绩象
创世主大梵天和众敬王一样，
只有从无数的善行中才能诞生这样一位领袖，
他象太阳普照大地。
您的著作象珍珠一样宝贵，
像海浪一样汹涌澎湃，
远及天涯。)
As regards the theoretical basis for the rule of the Chinese Communist Marxist, he is not think so: "The more I read of Marxism, the more like it, this is a response to each and every one built on equality, justice-based system, this is all a sick world a cure-all. ... ... I am also concerned about the Chinese Communists in the pursuit of their ideals and the means used. I feel very rigid, being the case, I expressed the wish to join the party. "(the ease in exile: the Dalai Lama, his autobiography). So until he fled to India, begging for Western aid, and democracy must be seen in all relations, not surprising. Including his statement now, Germany's "only democracy can completely overcome the separatism." However, the Dalai Lama speak at different times, then put together, this out-and-out opportunist, how to make people believe this? Finally, the need to mention that the reason why the Dalai Lama and the notorious pro-democracy activists to keep in touch more and democracy has nothing to do, but to the outside world in order to prove that there are no more than the Chinese people support him.
In addition to self-contradictory, the more often the use of the Dalai Lama of Tibet, the Western religion, culture, tradition and ignorance of reality, and to mislead deliberately trick. For example, the run this year in commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of his latest autobiography, published in this claim: If the establishment of a democratic government in Tibet, he will not hold any positions. In Tibetan Buddhism as the supreme religious leader, he is simply no need for any administrative duties. As Iran's religious leaders, where the need for what government offices? Separation of church and state but not the Western understanding, natural unavoidable for the Dalai Lama and touched by the selfless. For instance, he often accused the junior high school in Tibet, the use of Chinese language teaching, language extinction. But he opened his own school in India, the use of English is not the Tibetan language has not been forthcoming. In fact, the only Tibetan language of religion and life, the lack of modern science and engineering terms, not the junior high school teaching. In fact the Chinese government over the past few years has been the preparation and publication of a number of Tibetan-Chinese Dictionary of Science and Technology, the Dalai Lama in exile in India and no one group. Laugh even more is that he published in the West a "Dalai Lama talk about Christ," the book, tried every means to meet the needs of the West. In this book he claimed: "I believe that all the great traditional religions is not from the establishment of a huge temple, but into the hearts of the establishment of the Church of sympathy and kindness." This is not only a misreading of the Christian tradition, on which he has accused the Chinese government to build more temples restraint measures (the proportion of religious groups in Tibet have been in excess of the Buddhist country of Thailand has become a huge burden on society) irony. Reformation in the West is going to happen, not because the Pope was to build large-scale churches, lack of funds around the sale of "coupon redemption" you money? Europe and the United States often find the Dalai Lama to visit the city should know the landmarks rather than the church? Around the city there is no church buildings?
On the other hand, however, has fallen to the Dalai Lama and the credibility had already bankrupt, fragmented alliance of pro-democracy groups, to seek support, reflecting the smooth, he is a dead end to the. 74 this year the Dalai Lama, to face the reality if, for the sake of Sino-Tibetan people's happiness, it should be done early decision. Hold the past in Tibet when he was signed only "17", and now nothing I do not know why he caught it?
